Scroll less, discover more
welcome everybody
I am Nour from Gaza
.I need your help if you can
Please donate to save my life and the lives of my children
I'm asking for a small donation of $25 from each person. $35 will save my kids from death
Through the link (please see my CV) https://www.gofundme.com/f/donate-to-help-nour-and-his-family-escape-the-war-in-gaza
My account has been verified by @90-ghost
please help if you can, anything helps, even just sharing.
Hello dear friends
My name is Ahmed Khalil from the Gaza Strip. I am a member of a family of eight. Our home was destroyed, and we were forcibly displaced from northern Gaza to the south after orders from Israeli forces.đđ
With a heavy heart and a feeling of shame, I am sending you this message from under the bombardment and destruction. The relentless bombing never seems to stop, making Gaza an unsafe place to live.đ„șđ
I ask you to stand by my side and help save me and my family. We urgently need your financial support and help in sharing my posts so that I can secure the basic necessities for my family. Additionally, your donations can help us evacuate to a safe place.đđđ
Your small donation and sharing will make a difference and have a significant impact. Please don't hesitate to donate and share.đđ
Thank you for hearing my story.
https://gofund.me/03d8504e
if you can please donate or at least share so more people could know about this
I will be posting *DAILY* Halloween themed posts. :-D
Scream is top tier horror. Good sequels, good plot twists, and good fucking characters!!! And award of the best final girl goes to Sydney fucking prescott!!
Heart Eyes (2025) directed by Josh Ruben
2/7/25Â
*No Spoilers*
Horror movies are hard to make, the hardest being slasher flicks, because everyone has seen at least one in their lifetime. Itâs easy to fall into the same tempo that other slasher flicks have, but what breaks my heart is when a slasher takes a unique concept and squanders it. Heart Eyes, directed by Josh Ruben, is a great example of this.Â
I usually know when I wonât like a movie, I get a tingling sensation in my gut and I know Iâm in for a bad time. The concept of the movie sounded interesting to me, a serial killer who targets couples on Valentineâs Day stalks enemies-to-lovers coworkers who must work together to survive. That is an interesting premise, but the execution was bland and unoriginal.Â
The movie centers around Ally (Olivia Holt) and Jay (Mason Gooding), coworkers tasked with nullifying a company PR crisis on Valentineâs Day. However, when theyâre mistaken for a couple by the Heart Eyes Killer, their night spirals out of control, leading to death and mayhem.Â
I was hopeful during the first few minutes of the film. What I was hoping for was a darkly macabre critique on dating culture, as the opening sequence of the film made me chortle from the goofy actions of the characters who were soon slaughtered. It was a humorous sequence, but also heavy-handed and blunt with itâs jokes. This brand of humor tainted the movie, making it borderline unwatchable. I wouldâve been fine with constant tongue-in-cheek jokes if they were good. But they werenât good, none of them were, and it ruined my viewing experience. While watching this film, there were several middle-grade children in the audience and I noticed they were the only ones laughing at the âfunnyâ parts of the movie. It tried so hard to be quirky and funny, almost like a black comedy, but it wasnât a black comedy, it was a mediocre slasher film with terrible jokes written by older folks for a younger audience.Â
There was a scene that I wouldâve really loved, an emotional scene where Jay and Allyâs characters were finally opening up to each other, and it wouldâve been the best scene in the movie, except the entirety of it is overshadowed by the violent sex noises of the couple behind them. It wouldâve been fine if you could faintly hear the coupleâs moaning, but the sound guys pulled out all the stops with wet clapping sounds, sometimes louder than the actorâs themselves. Imagine the scene from Titanic where Jack dies, now picture the same scene with aggressively loud porn playing in the background. It wouldnât surprise me if Holt and Gooding did this scene not knowing what was going to be plugged in the background, then saw the end result at the screening and were mortified. The only good scene in the entire movie was ruined by this filmâs stupid juvenile humor. I love a good joke, especially raunchy ones, but this film has no idea what it wants to be. Is it a black comedy, or is it a horror film? It canât make up itâs mind.Â
You can always tell when a white person is writing a black character, you can always tell when a man is writing a female character, and you can always tell when people over the age of fifty are writing characters under the age of thirty. There were so many brainrot sentences in this film that my brain was slowly growing numb from the viewing experience. Phrases such as incel, beta, troll, sugar daddy, love language, algorithm, and shooting my shot were all used, and they were all used in a clumsy way, as if the writers werenât used to the crazy slang the kids of today use. One character even used the sentence âincel-beta-trollâ to describe the killer. It was all so painful to watch. After watching the movie, I checked to see what else the writers worked on and it did not surprise me to learn the writers behind Heart Eyes were the same masterminds who constructed Freaky (2020) and Happy Death Day 2U (2019).Â
The protagonists and the killer are both extremely dumb. There are points in this movie where both Jay and Ally have a clear shot to kill Heart Eyes and they donât pull the trigger. Even when they do, they wound him in some arbitrary place that doesnât stop him from hurting others. Likewise, the killer has several opportunities to kill the two and blows it everytime. The killer goes from being a spectacular marksman, one who can nail a target from fifty feet away, and seconds later he can hardly hit Ally at all. Those who watched the movie might argue that the plot twist (if you can even call it that) explained this discrepancy, but it doesnât and I would be happy to argue about it in my DMs.Â
Also, I predicted who the killer was in the first twenty minutes. I also predicted the plot twist and neither of them were shocking at all. Not to mention the killerâs motivations are so vague and stupid I was angry by the time the credits rolled.Â
What saddens me is that Olivia Holt and Mason Gooding are good actors, theyâre a big part of the reason why I saw the movie in the first place. Their acting was a highlight of the movie. They werenât god tier, but they were good, and getting someone to care about a two-dimensional character is hard. Holt and Gooding took two flat characters and enhanced them and thatâs something I can appreciate. My only hope is that this movie does well at the box office and the two of them can move on to more apt rolls that are better suited for their talents.Â
Another aspect of the movie I enjoyed was the fight scenes. They felt quick and fluid, which I enjoyed. Thatâs pretty much all there is to say about this disappointment of a movie. If youâre planning a Valentineâs date night go watch Companion instead. This movie is not worth your time.Â
Final Grade: D
Rick Stepp (irresponsibleink@gmail.com)
1/31/25
Companion (2025) directed by Drew Hancock
*No Spoilers*
If I had to choose my favorite media trope, it would be the Relatable Robot. This trope has been used countless times, with later examples such as Terminator 2 and recent examples like Alien Romulus. Companion adds to this growing list, contributing a rogue sexbot thatâs framed for murder, and despite being one month in, this might be one of my favorite movies of the year.Â
Companion opens with Josh (Jack Quaid) and his girlfriend, Iris (Sophie Thatcher), who are going to a remote cabin to spend some time with Joshâs friends, Kat (Megan Suri), Eli (Harvey GuillĂ©n), Patrick (Lukas Cage), and Sergey (Rupert Friend). Iris feels off about the trip and bares a suspicion that Joshâs friends donât like her. The truth is far more unsettling. After an unfortunate series of events, Iris discovers sheâs a Companion, a robot made for subservience and intimacy. As she comes to terms with this truth, she must fight to stay alive and get home before her boyfriend and his friends murder her.Â
All the actors were amazing, but the standouts were Sophie Thatcher and Jack Quaid. Thatcherâs character, Iris, must accept some terrible truths while also doing whatever it takes to survive, and Thatcher does a great job making us feel for a supposed machine. I liked her the moment she insisted Josh say 'thank you' to the Alexa in their car. From bright and earnest, to badass and scary, her range knows no bounds. Irisâs one goal is to make Josh happy, but we can sense that deep down Iris is unsatisfied with the circumstances. Quaidâs character, Josh, is a difficult one to portray, because for the story to work, he needs to present as a harmless nice guy, who actually has something nasty and depraved lurking beneath, and Quaid did a great job. You can tell through Jack Quaidâs intentional choices and actions, Josh truly believes that he is the good guy, even when his actions are deplorable. Â
This movieâs true antagonist is the âNice Guy.â Josh believes he is owed something for how âniceâ he is. He believes the world is rigged against him, and Iris isnât enough for him because he âdeserves someone real.â Heâs controlling with robots and heâs controlling with humans, and his arrogance and self-entitlement lead to everything spiraling out of control. I related to Irisâs character because I think weâve all tried to find worth in someone else, and thatâs what I felt when watching this movie. Iris believes that sheâll be happy if Josh is happy, she believes sheâll feel complete, and you can feel how desperate she is to really be loved and accepted by Josh. The power dynamic in the movie shifts when Iris begins to accept herself. This movie draws on themes such as consent and personal choice, and the ending brings everything together nicely.Â
Final Grade: A+
Rick Stepp (irresponsibleink@gmail.com)
**No Spoilers**
I watched Blood and Honey 2 on opening night and I was surprised. The first movie was mediocre and my hopes for the sequel were in the gutter. It seems director Rhys Frake-Waterfield worked out some kinks from the first movie. Maybe constructive criticism did its job here and Frake-Waterfield listened to the reviews of the first film.Â
The first Blood and Honey film put spectacle over storytelling. The production team expected the sensationalism of the concept to carry it through and they were mistaken. Reviewing the first film in any serious capacity would be a mistake, as itâs clear they werenât trying to make a serious film. They took the sequel more seriously, which opened the door for guys like me to tear into it. For people like me who have seen a lot of slasher flicks, Blood and Honey was nothing to write home about. During my viewing of the first film, I had to fight to stay awake.Â
The sequel changed some details from the first film. For starters, this film includes characters such as Owl and Tigger, who werenât in the public domain when the first movie was in production. I was pissed Tigger wasnât in the first film. Tigger is the Batman to Poohâs Superman and if anyone can tell you with a straight face they prefer Pooh to Tigger they are not to be trusted. Another change I enjoyed was the redesign of Pooh and Piglet. I understand the original design was about taking the original character of Pooh and making him scary, but you canât tell me that Pooh is supposed to be a bear-human hybrid and then show me a man with yellow leathery skin. In this film, they updated Pooh to look more animalistic, giving him hints of fur and razor-sharp teeth.Â
They also changed the leading man, recasting Christopher Robinâs character with producer Scott Chambers. The acting in this film is pretty standard. The strongest link in the crew was Tallulah Evans who had good charisma as her character Lexy. Except Lexy, the supporting roles were not greatly noticeable and they didnât take up a lot of runtime.Â
The special effects were a step up, as well. In the first film, the crummy effects made the gore look a lot less like blood and guts and more like some cheap props you could buy at a discount store. I'm surprised that Pooh didn't appear after the credits and thank PartyCity for sponsoring the movie. In the sequel, the props looked very professional. The gore looked real enough to make your stomach turn but not so real you canât enjoy snacking during the movie.Â
Character-wise, I was invested in Christopherâs story. I was rooting for him right from the beginning. This film opens with everyone in his small town believing heâs a brutal killer and that leaves him on a quest to deal with his trauma and confront his monsters (both real and figurative). I liked the supporting characters. It was very endearing to see how much Lexy and Bunny (Thea Evans) cared about Christopher and believed in him when a lot of people didnât.Â
While I was invested in Christopherâs journey, the first three-quarters of the movie dragged a bit. Christopher is on a quest for answers, so naturally, a lot of the film is him trying to get to those answers any way he can. But this is still a slasher film! During this âinvestigativeâ period, they throw in a few kills to keep us invested, but Christopher and Pooh donât even confront each other until the final quarter of the film.Â
Speaking of the kills, they were very brutal. Bear traps, exploding campers, flaming chainsaws, what fun! A lot of people may think, âA flaming chainsaw? That isnât realistic!â All I have to say is, dude, if youâre worried about how a flaming chainsaw isnât realistic then maybe a movie about animal-human hybrids isnât for you.Â
The score was fine, but there were times when the music was a little out of place. It was disorienting to be watching a sad or frightening scene and hear music that sounded hopeful. The narrator also took the piss out of the movie. It was so jarring to watch a serious and intense scene and then to jump to narration like someone is reading a bedtime story to us.Â
About that plot twist⊠Words cannot describe how out of left field it was. Iâm glad they explained where the creatures came from, but⊠yikes. It was entertaining, but a bit convoluted. Also, why did Pooh have to be that character the whole time? That just complicates Christopher and Poohâs relationship in a way it didnât need to be complicated. They already had a troubled past together, so why make it more tragic for no reason?Â
Then there was the rave scene. I almost cheered when Tigger came onto the scene. I love Tigger! Whether heâs bouncing around in a colorful cartoon or murdering people with his claws and calling his victims fluorescent bitches, Tigger is the OG of the Hundred Acre Wood. And it was so fun to see Pooh batter people around while trap music played. It reminded me of that party bus scene from Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2022). I also loved how Pooh and the others kept Tigger in a cage because they knew how fucking crazy he was.Â
Was it a good movie? Uh, sure? It wasnât the best slasher Iâve ever seen but watching it wasnât a complete waste of time. I would wait until this one hits streaming services before you go watch it. A part of me feels stupid for spending money to watch such a mediocre movie when I could have just waited for it to come to Peacock. That being said, Iâm genuinely excited to see what else the Twitsted Childhood Universe has to offer.Â
I believe Frake-Waterfield is self-aware about how stupid these movies are. But theyâre fun to watch and I bet theyâre pretty fun to make. There are worse moves to watch this weekend.
Final score = 62.5%
Rick Stepp (calebstepp23@gmail.com)
This (@omaxy ) is a fake blog and steal content of people from here n there even erase their watermark n post on their own blog mainly stealing from @melancholiacs
Plz report .
Chungking Express (1994) dir. Wong Kar-wai
NO LAWNMOWER COULD TAKE AWAY THE HEAD I WOULD GIVE HIM! đ„
House of Wax (2005)